Why The Workplace Needs Creativity

The workplace is an important place of business, creativity makes business thrive, but stress and job dissatisfaction can ruin that. The workplace has become a place notorious for stress. To nourish the relationship between creativity to undoubtedly increase its influence on employee engagement there has to be structured in place. Unbelief, discouragement, staggeringly disrupts the creative process. The integral premise here is that if the workplace is un-ordered, and morale is low, creativity is less likely to be aflame. Creativity in effective levels sustains employee morale. Confidence, engagement, and employee performance are the antecedents of innovation. Trudy C. DiLiello, Jeffery D. Houghton, (2006) Creativity needs a place where there is ethics. Amabile and her team conducted a study on the objective nature of creativity in the workplace, and its influence on employee engagement, and its influence on the workplace. Highly elevated creativity thinking levels were absent in workplaces that have a restrictive, and less liberating culture. Additionally, this line of inquiry matters because surmountable evidence concludes that a liberating culture is one with dynamic boundaries in place or support mechanisms that encourage the establishment of creative routines. (DiLiello, D. Houghton, (2006) Amabile, Cramer, 2011).

The material world has been man’s sole object since he came into being. Dayton, P. K., & Sala, E. (2001). The ability to manifest the unpredictability of the natural world into an idea, and therefore create out of that uncertainty is man’s true challenge. The mind itself is riddled with an intense search for identifying with nature this battle of inward introspection directly modifies the experience of an individual. Orwell argued in his book 1984 that, ‘’reality exists in the mind and nowhere else.’’ (Orwell, G., Pimlott, B., & Davison, P. H. 1989)..’’ Martin Heidegger unanimously believed that the human identification of the individual with its natural environment was all too do with the social construct of the given society. In other words our culture, and traditionally directly influence our minds Hoffman, P. (2000). The downside of creativity in the stressed individual is the inability to create out of a positive environment. In other words, the inability to connect with reality is associated with people who are depersonalised . And the workplace when not set up properly for the individual can create an environment of hostility for the individual then the employer has a way of analysing, and therefore remedying the situation, when mental health is recognised as a common factor of employee disengagement then, Hennessey, B. A. Evaluating job performance indicators can estimate the achievements of an employee, however, the on-going vitality of a task is observed by the employee’s skill to think independently, and autonomously. Barnes, S. J. (1997).

It is important to understand rewarding an employee can facilitate creativity, allowing them to have a choice about their workstation, or have an input to how operations are managed in a workplace can allow the employee to have a meaningful experience, therefore, increasing creativity tenfold. Yu Zhou, Yingying Zhang, Ángeles Montoro‐Sánchez, (2011). Building on these ideas, workplaces that are less open to new, and novel ideas had lesser job satisfaction, 234 people participated in this study, 64,000 events were recorded and analysed over a twelve-year period. One of the instruments that were used to analyse this event was a daily electronic diary that recorded the employee’s experience at their workplace for the day. From analysing the entries a conclusion was drawn the relationship between creativity, and innovation is one of fruition. (Trudy C. DiLiello, Jeffery D. Houghton, (2006), ( Amabile, Cramer, 2011). Creativity and innovation can only reside with each other they have a co-dependent relationship, Zhou, J., & Su, Y. (2010). The relationship of dependency as measured, and defined as before is engagement. Engagement during the creative act is exceedingly pivotal. Heightened, and the increase in productivity is important, Thompson, L. (2003).. Encouragement also has a spatial sphere to it, and that spatial sphere is the management, and employee relations. A predication of employee morale is job satisfaction is their overall daily body language. Workplace culture is an important focus in the theoretical analysis of creativity. Nowadays creativity in the workplace is often overlooked or shun. What could be a beneficial provider to the ecosystem of the workplace is misrepresented, undermined, and evidently non-existent Villalba, E. (2008). 

Often people reject new ideas because it is out of their comfort zone, Thompson, (2014). Some scholars have also have disagreed about the importance of creativity because it is a highly theoretical, and subjective phenomenon, on the contrary, new studies have been compiled and completed, its objective nature has had more quantitative evidence to support its importance in direct relation to innovation. Barnes, S. J. (1997). In the sciences, creativity is an organic process, and essentially difficult to comprehend because it is a refined process of thinking Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). Former Editor of the Harvard Ted Levitt is anti-creativity he espouses that creativity is not enough. Levitt’s is essentially pro-anti-creativity. The conflicting fallacy with this view is that it stumps progress. Creativity within a framework that encourages employee engagement is far beyond this theory that most ideas are unoriginal and inapplicable to the world’s economy. Amabile’s study concluded that a supportive environment that is built to nurture creativity is a win, win, situation. Because the real problem left out of the equation is the employee. The producer of the product is the driver of innovation Yusuf, S. (2009).. Theodore Levitt, (2002).

Teresa Amabile’s theory of creativity is far more advanced and universal the common generalised view of creativity. Creativity is virtually subjective in the personal sense, and objective in the collective sense. It is a new facet of the workplace culture that is a paradigm shift. A few scientists are anti-innovation, and are against creativity they are driven by their biases, and traditional ideologies, which is a detriment to progress, and new ideas, (Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. ) . As an illustration, a few peer-reviewed articles that had more novel ideas were often rejected, but medicine journals were far more viable. Lateral thinking is rejected because it does not follow the patterns of linear logic Amabile, T. (2006).. Thompson, D. (201 8). In an article written by Derek Thompson, he elaborates on about how the leader of Microsoft said the iPhone would fail. A recent study showed that 80% of the American people hate their jobs. A dispassionate labor force feels uncreative, or unoriginal. All they want to do is contribute. Robaton, A. (2017, March 31). This trend is paramount in order to understand the connection, between creativity, and innovation. In spite of large economic growth people are still unmotivated, and not passionate. A reason for this is the culture of the workplace, to overcome such a dilemma employee have to be engaged Adler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. (2011

Managerial employee relationships are important to creativity, (Lang, J. C., & Lee, C. H. (2010). For example, reviews can measure the achievements of a manager, however the on-going vitality of a task is observed by the manager’s skill to think in determining the barriers to creative output for their employees. Collective responsibility for their employee’s satisfaction by encouraging them to be a brick in the process of workplace relations, will likely indicate continual growth in an employee’s time. Trudy C. DiLiello, Jeffery D. Houghton, (2006). A manager can inspect the drives of their employees by having a discussion about what urges the employee to think with laterality. Barnes, S. J. (1997). Organisational standards and practices that directly moderate, experiences, and attitudes can advance the potency of a workplace’s creativity levels. Behavioural traits can be specified as preferred tactics towards the activity, or job (Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. 2002). The workstation, and design of a workplace can drive creativity. Martens, Y. (2011). The design and architecture of a workstation can be elemental for inspiration. Ergonomic equipment also helps the creative process because if an environment is comfortable, and organised it can create a positive atmosphere. Kerstin Sailer. (2011). As stated before reducing all barriers to creativity means eliminating anything that stifles employee engagement. Yu Zhou, Yingying Zhang, Ángeles Montoro Sánchez, (2011).

The significance of organisational success is everybody’s responsibility to help nurture the force that drives innovation, and revenue. The decline of employee morale, and confidence in their management needs further analysis. If the creative output is in decline revenue, and profitability is down. Subsequently, employees are the creators of the product. The consequences of an uncreative, and unoriginal approach to the marketplace are clearly observable new ideas gain more revenue apple is an example of that a company driven by creativity the first trillion dollar company Furthermore, these scholarly insights in this paper suggest the responsibility is with the employee to produce the product, but it is also up to management to nurture their employees to make sure their engagement is necessary for the habitation of creativity. The value of creativity needs to be understood more clearly. The business climate has to changed so that creativity can thrive, or it will always be in decline like it is now.

References

Gong, Y., Cheung, S. Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J. C. (2012). Unfolding the Proactive Process for Creativity: Integration of the Employee Proactivity, Information Exchange, and Psychological Safety Perspectives. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380250

Zhou, J., & Su, Y. (2010). A missing piece of the puzzle: The organizational context in cultural patterns of creativity. Management and Organization Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00192.x

Martens, Y. (2011). Creative workplace: Instrumental and symbolic support for creativity. Facilities. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111101331

Lang, J. C., & Lee, C. H. (2010). Workplace humor and organizational creativity. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903466855

Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.00337.x

Montag, T., Maertz, C. P., & Baer, M. (2012). A Critical Analysis of the Workplace Creativity Criterion Space. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441835

Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving: Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Human Performance. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1702_4

Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156

Amabile, T. (2006). How to kill creativity. In Creative Management and Development, Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446213704.n2

Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378025

Thompson, L. (2003). Improving the creativity of organizational work groups. Academy of Management Executive. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2003.9474814

Sutton, R. I. (2001). The weird rules of creativity. Harvard Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2002.1022420

Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The Bias Against Creativity. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018

Adler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. (2011). Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.02.002

Robaton, A. (2017, March 31). Why so many Americans hate their jobs. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-so-many-americans-hate-their-jobs/

Hennessey, B. A. (2003). The Social Psychology of Creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308601

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

Chua, R. Y. J., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J.-F. (2015). The Impact of Culture on Creativity. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214563595

Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., Spinath, F. M., Borkenau, P., & Penke, L. (2016). The nature of creativity: The roles of genetic factors, personality traits, cognitive abilities, and environmental sources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000087

Yusuf, S. (2009). From creativity to innovation. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.007

Villalba, E. (2008). On Creativity Towards an Understanding of Creativity and its Measurements. JCR Scientific and Technical Reports. http://doi.org/10.2788/2936

Fox, N. J. (2013). Creativity and health: An anti-humanist reflection. Health (United Kingdom). http://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312464074

Bradley, F. (2012). Creativity: Does place matter? London Review of Education. http://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2012.691280

McCullough, M. (1998). Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. Constraints. http://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2001.34.1.78b

Fairfield, J. a T. (2008). Anti-social Contracts: The Contractual Governance of Virtual Worlds. McGill Law Journal.

Dayton, P. K., & Sala, E. (2001). Natural History: the sense of wonder, creativity and progress in ecology. Scientia Marina. http://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2001.65s2199

Hoffman, P. (2000). Heidegger and the problem of idealism. Inquiry (United Kingdom). http://doi.org/10.1080/002017400750051215

Enquist, M., Ghirlanda, S., Jarrick, A., & Wachtmeister, C. A. (2008). Why does human culture increase exponentially? Theoretical Population Biology. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2008.04.007

(Orwell, G., Pimlott, B., & Davison, P. H. 1989). Nineteen eighty-four. London: Penguin Books in association with Secker & Warburg.